New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Gh workflow #5
Gh workflow #5
Conversation
|
WARNING!!! This PR is not attached to an issue. In most cases this is not advisable. Please see our PR docs for more information about how to attach this PR to an issue. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. It looks like the commit needs to be updated though.
|
@daviddavis I have another thing to try. So it's not quite ready. |
219be57
to
2817ccf
Compare
| description: "Build (TODO: and test) pulp container images" | ||
| runs: | ||
| using: "docker" | ||
| image: "Dockerfile" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@fao89 @daviddavis
As much as it was worth to see how actions work, i'm not sure if calling a common scripts in both workflows were the more pragmatic way. WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 script sounds good, makes it more CI agnostic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't add the scripts for the two lines we have atm. But the ticket says we are going to do tests also.
Co-authored-by: Fabricio Aguiar <fabricio.aguiar@gmail.com> fixes #6728 https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6728
[noissue] Co-authored-by: David Davis <daviddavis@users.noreply.github.com>
No description provided.