[noissue]: Include django-storages Python package in order to enable … #136
Conversation
…S3 storage after installation
|
If we need an extra package for s3 support, I think we ought to make it an option, which would require the addition of a new ansible var. Alternatively, if we are going to install it every time, we might as well add to |
|
I'm in favor of the installer option since not all users will want this dependency. |
|
I agree that it should be an installer option. I think it should be an "extras" dependency (extras_require in setup.py), but I think the Ansible Installer should default to installing it. Let the advanced users slim down their install. |
|
@makesse are you interested in making these changes? (BTW thanks for the PR!!) If you'd like to chat synchronously, ping me in #pulp-dev on freenode. |
|
@asmacdo: you are welcome. I will try to be on IRC tomorrow, lets see if we can discuss. For me the option as proposed by @mikedep333 sounds like the best solution, as the Ansible install to me feels liks it is pitched to be your one stop shop. How do you feel about this? |
|
@makesse, yeah we are aiming for 1 stop shop, so +1 @mikedep333's solution. |
|
+1 to the one stop shop w/ customization for slimming it down. |
|
@makesse How's it going with this PR? Do you need help? |
|
@mikedep333 : work work, will schedule some time for this issue in the upcoming two weeks. |
|
@makesse Just reminding you that this is still open, and that we can help you with it. And that we agreed on the approach:
|
|
@makesse Just reminding you that this is still open, and that we can help you with it. |
|
We are now handling this more robustly via: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6726 |
…S3 storage after installation