New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge pulplift #440
Merge pulplift #440
Conversation
|
WARNING!!! This PR is not attached to an issue. In most cases this is not advisable. Please see our PR docs for more information about how to attach this PR to an issue. |
59c0cf2
to
b0b79be
Compare
|
@mdellweg In the past, I have merged history from 1 repo into another. It's easy to do for a distinct set of files, even if it means putting all of the contents of the pulplift repo into a subfolder in pulp_installer (permanently or temporarily.) I want us to try do that to merge pulplift into pulp_installer. I think these are the instructions I followed: |
8a71731
to
1aeddbb
Compare
That sounds like a lot of work, and i'd need to know now which files i want to move over... |
ba8e581
to
436d532
Compare
436d532
to
bf91eff
Compare
c3980c6
to
1cf934c
Compare
@mikedep333
As i heard people dislike complicated commit trees several times in the past we should probably pick 1. |
ed68e1f
to
a40a3b1
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⭐
| [ssh_connection] | ||
| pipelining = True |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a setting that speeds things up greatly, but breaks a small % of users running pulp_installer directly from the pulp_installer folder.
But now that the official install instructions are to run from an installed collection, we can do this safely :)
So I like this change, and an FYI & thank you that your Collection work enabled this.
| @@ -4,19 +4,26 @@ | |||
| - name: Load the SELinux policy packages | |||
| command: 'semodule -i /usr/local/share/selinux/{{ ansible_facts.selinux.type }}/{{ item }}.pp' | |||
| loop: '{{ __pulp_selinux_policy_pkgs }}' | |||
| become: true | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, how the heck did these work previously? I think this may fix a recently reported issue by a user.
These are worthy of a changelog entry.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The ansible.cfg in pulplift contains a "become=yes" that seemed wrong to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we have a ticket?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have now:
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7736
| @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ | |||
| --- | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately, there is now 1 new commit on the pulplift master branch that we need.
https://github.com/pulp/pulplift/pull/108/files
(One of them adds a new file in this directory,)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh yes, that's unfortunate...
I will have a look tomorrow.
[noissue]
This is needed to deploy pulp2 in the migration box [noissue]
[noissue]
a40a3b1
to
be9c93e
Compare
pulp#444 https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7043 Also update subrepos [noissue]
|
@mikedep333 CI failure is unrelated. |
[noissue]
At this point in time, this is an experiment.