Change the user-facing name of "update" to "errata" #1354
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nixocio
approved these changes
May 23, 2019
Advisory the more common name throughout the ecosystem. [noissue]
daviddavis
approved these changes
May 23, 2019
nixocio
pushed a commit
to nixocio/pulpcore
that referenced
this pull request
May 24, 2019
Update RPM constants to be according to the new changes added to RPM plugin. See: pulp/pulp_rpm#1354 '[noissue]'
nixocio
pushed a commit
to pulp/pulpcore
that referenced
this pull request
May 24, 2019
Update RPM constants to be according to the new changes added to RPM plugin. See: pulp/pulp_rpm#1354 '[noissue]'
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[noissue]
Justification: The name "UpdateRecord" is exclusively an implementation detail of createrepo_c, it doesn't seem like they are named as such anywhere else in the ecosystem. We shouldn't expose such an implementation detail to end users.