Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove custom JSONField implementation #301

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 20, 2019
Merged

Conversation

dralley
Copy link
Contributor

@dralley dralley commented Sep 17, 2019

This was quick to do and since it requires a redo of all the migrations I figured it would be good timing to do it at the same time as Fabricio's PR that will also need to redo the migrations

@daviddavis
Copy link
Contributor

This change LGTM. Just need to fix Travis.

Copy link
Contributor

@daviddavis daviddavis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@dralley dralley force-pushed the rm-jsonfield branch 3 times, most recently from 7443d98 to e790204 Compare September 20, 2019 14:41
Remove our TextField-based JSONField implementation and use the
PostgreSQL Django-supplied one instead.

closes: #5465
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/5465
@dralley dralley merged commit 9151923 into pulp:master Sep 20, 2019
@dralley dralley deleted the rm-jsonfield branch September 20, 2019 16:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants