New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Using check-manifest to update manifest #957
Conversation
939584b
to
c19b8c9
Compare
|
Attached issue: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7656 |
| "HISTORY.rst", | ||
| "dev_requirements.txt", | ||
| "doc_requirements.txt", | ||
| "docs/**", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this mean we're not including the docs in our shipped python wheels? Or are they still included in the sdists? Do we publish sdists or wheels only?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm hoping someone with more knowledge of our packaging weighs in here but I believe we aren't shipping docs with our wheels. Not sure about your other questions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW, MANIFEST.in affects sdists only, not bdists like wheels. So I believe docs are not included in the sdists.
Not sure what is included into bdists by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great, thank you.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
refs #7656
Please be sure you have read our documentation on creating PRs:
https://docs.pulpproject.org/contributing/pull-request-walkthrough.html