-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(IAC-1186) Add $use_port_for_filenames parameter #2122
(IAC-1186) Add $use_port_for_filenames parameter #2122
Conversation
When using $use_servername_for_filenames = true, virtual hosts with the same $servername but a different $port will introduce a duplicate resource declaration. Introduce a $use_port_for_filenames that act in concert with $use_servername_for_filenames to avoid this situation.
|
This is a follow-up to #2086, so ping @sanfrancrisko and @sheenaajay who worked on this previous PR and @DavidS who proposed this change in IAC-1186. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2122 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 56.36% 56.36%
=======================================
Files 12 12
Lines 220 220
=======================================
Hits 124 124
Misses 96 96 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
2612306
to
352f9f2
Compare
352f9f2
to
fb2a84f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Apologies, I was a bit less involved in the conversation on IAC-1186 than I wanted to (was out on training most of last week).
Thanks for getting the enhancement up 👍
When using $use_servername_for_filenames = true, virtual hosts with the
same $servername but a different $port will introduce a duplicate
resource declaration.
Introduce a $use_port_for_filenames that act in concert with
$use_servername_for_filenames to avoid this situation.