Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "(MODULES-3522) Removing redundant 'requires'" #759

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2023

Conversation

LukasAud
Copy link
Contributor

As established in #758, this update caused an unexpected regression. Reverts #755

@LukasAud LukasAud requested a review from a team as a code owner March 13, 2023 09:32
@puppet-community-rangefinder
Copy link

concat_file is a type

Breaking changes to this file WILL impact these 1 modules (exact match):
Breaking changes to this file MAY impact these 2 modules (near match):

This module is declared in 169 of 580 indexed public Puppetfiles.


These results were generated with Rangefinder, a tool that helps predict the downstream impact of breaking changes to elements used in Puppet modules. You can run this on the command line to get a full report.

Exact matches are those that we can positively identify via namespace and the declaring modules' metadata. Non-namespaced items, such as Puppet 3.x functions, will always be reported as near matches only.

@chelnak
Copy link
Contributor

chelnak commented Mar 13, 2023

Thanks!

I'd be interested to know exactly why this happened and if it is something that we can test for?

Copy link
Member

@david22swan david22swan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@david22swan david22swan merged commit a200911 into main Mar 13, 2023
@david22swan david22swan deleted the revert-755-MODULES-3522-Updating_constant branch March 13, 2023 10:22
@canihavethisone
Copy link

canihavethisone commented Mar 13, 2023

Thanks!

I'd be interested to know exactly why this happened and if it is something that we can test for?

@chelnak
In this case running puppet generate types would have detected the issue. Is it worth adding that to acceptance tests? As I have recently learned, running that is standard in PE and best practice upon r10k deployments etc, so it should be catered for IMO

@ekohl
Copy link
Collaborator

ekohl commented Mar 13, 2023

I thought about the same thing, though I wonder if it should be an acceptance test or part of the unit test suite.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants