Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop postgresql 8.1/RHEL5 specific code #1486

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 31, 2023
Merged

Conversation

bastelfreak
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary

Provide a detailed description of all the changes present in this pull request.

Additional Context

Add any additional context about the problem here.

  • Root cause and the steps to reproduce. (If applicable)
  • Thought process behind the implementation.

Related Issues (if any)

Mention any related issues or pull requests.

Checklist

  • 馃煝 Spec tests.
  • 馃煝 Acceptance tests.
  • Manually verified. (For example puppet apply)

Copy link
Collaborator

@ekohl ekohl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you do this, I'd also drop setting the default to 8.1 for some OSes and also remove test code.

And dropping 8.1 is probably fine, but I think Puppetlabs will want to continue supporting RHEL 6 while that's supported by Red Hat and that means keeping 8.4 I think.

@bastelfreak
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I dropped all postgresql 8.1 or RHEL 5 specific code. The metadata.json only mentions RHEL7 and newer so I think that's fine.

@bastelfreak bastelfreak changed the title server::database: Drop postgresql 8.1 specific code Drop postgresql 8.1/RHEL5 specific code Aug 30, 2023
@bastelfreak bastelfreak merged commit 4f1d08f into puppetlabs:main Aug 31, 2023
38 checks passed
@bastelfreak bastelfreak deleted the 81 branch August 31, 2023 08:36
@ekohl
Copy link
Collaborator

ekohl commented Aug 31, 2023

The metadata.json only mentions RHEL7 and newer so I think that's fine.

In the past Puppet has had this weird policy where they didn't list something in metadata.json but then did support it, sort of. I don't like it, because it makes life harder but since it's in their namespace I have tried to respect it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants