-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 230
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for remote puppetdb #41
Conversation
| @@ -1,12 +1,11 @@ | |||
| name 'puppetlabs-puppetdb' | |||
| version '1.1.5' | |||
| source 'git://github.com/puppetlabs-puppet/puppetlabs-puppetdb.git' | |||
| version '1.1.6' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you not increment this? A release increment is decided at release time, its not tied to a particular patch. The next release may be 1.2.0 for example.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, does it mean that 1.2.0 a good target version for me now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just leave it as it was '1.1.5'. The future version should be determined in a release patch not in a particular feature patch like this one.
|
Thanks for your comments, I've been working on fixing the issues. |
|
@fhrbek cheers - added some more comments to your comments :-). |
|
CLA Signed by fhrbek on 2013-01-07 21:00:00 -0800 |
|
I added an rpec test (is it what you meant?) and I also removed the option (that I had introduced) of reading the puppetdb.conf file which is not needed any more after changing the pe_puppetdb module. It would be great if we could finally merge this PR and #37. |
|
@fhrbek. This will need to be rebased as well |
|
I've rebased. We've both added spec tests. They don't seem to be in conflict but most of yours fail on my machine, for example Am I doing anything wrong? |
|
@fhrbek are you running 'rake spec' to run the tests? |
This PR contains changes that were required to handle connection validation in a more flexible way. The new solution also allows (on demand, not by default) to store configuration settings even when puppetdb is not reachable.