Skip to content

(MODULES-7181) Remove Stdlib::(Ipv4|IPv6|Ip_address) #909

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 16, 2018

Conversation

baurmatt
Copy link
Contributor

There was 3 different data types for ip validation before this commit.
This removes the Stdlib::(Ipv4|IPv6|Ip_address) data type in favour of
Stdlib::IP::* as those are way more complete.

There was 3 different data types for ip validation before this commit.
This removes the Stdlib::(Ipv4|IPv6|Ip_address) data type in favour of
Stdlib::IP::* as those are way more complete.
@b4ldr
Copy link
Collaborator

b4ldr commented May 16, 2018

as the one that introduced those types, i agree, their should only be one interface for this  [and the compat one]. The Stdlib::IP::Address types are much nicer then the ones i introduced so we should keep them

@pegasd
Copy link
Contributor

pegasd commented Jul 29, 2018

The upcoming 5.0.0 release could be a good time to introduce these backwards-incompatible changes.

pmcmaw added 2 commits August 15, 2018 13:33
This commit includes changes to the README to redirect users to use a new function as this one has now been removed.
-`Stdlib::Ipv4` -> `Stdlib::IP::Address::V4`
-`Stdlib::Ipv6` ->  `Stdlib::IP::Address::V6`
-`Stdlib::Ip_address` -> `Stdlib::IP::Address'
@pmcmaw
Copy link
Contributor

pmcmaw commented Aug 15, 2018

@david22swan when merging can you ensure to squash and merge. There is a typo in my second commit. (Pressed enter and submitted by accident)

@HelenCampbell HelenCampbell merged commit cf93159 into puppetlabs:master Aug 16, 2018
@HelenCampbell
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for the PR @baurmatt !

@baurmatt baurmatt deleted the MODULES-7181 branch October 27, 2018 09:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants