Getting the below error while trying to open python code.

[omps]

Suspicious state from syntax checker python-flake8: Checker python-flake8 returned non-zero exit code 1, but no errors from output:Checker definition probably flawed.

[omps]

Soory this is fixed in the flycheck update. Closing now.

[omps]

flycheck/flycheck#635

[omps]

Looks like the above issue didn't fix the bug, and same error as reported earlier is still persistent. :)

[purcell]

You probably have an incompatible flake8 version. This doesn't seem like something specific to my .emacs.d config.

[purcell]

Specifically, I don't have any related configuration for flycheck, or flake8, so I'll close this issue, but please feel free to continue to discuss it here because I'm happy to help if I can.

[omps]

Thanks, yes I modified your emacs a little, but then I cloned your emacs.d from scratch and tried to run again, somehow I am getting the same error, trying to figure out what could be wrong here. Do you think there could be issue with flake8?

[purcell]

Do you think there could be issue with flake8?

Yes, that would be my guess. Hey @lunaryorn, is there a way to make flycheck show the raw command output to aid in debugging this sort of issue?

[swsnr]

@purcell C-c ! C-c python-flake8 will run flake8 and shows its output in a separate buffer. C-c ! v will also be of interest, as it shows the state of syntax checkers.

I wonder why flake8 fails. Last time I look, its tests passed fine. I rather think that there's an issue with the OP's system.

[omps]

@lunaryorn on Actually, I first thought it could be issue with the system, but
after trying on to other systems the problem remains. I in fact tried
building spurcell Emacs from scratch too. But I would check the commands
and report the output in the evening.
On 17 Jun 2015 01:39, "Sebastian Wiesner" notifications@github.com wrote:

@purcell https://github.com/purcell C-c ! C-c python-flake8 will run
flake8 and shows its output in a separate buffer. C-c ! v will also be of
interest, as it shows the state of syntax checkers.

I wonder why flake8 fails. Last time I look, its tests passed fine. I
rather think that there's an issue with the OP's system.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#272 (comment).

[omps]

Well I think i found the error, i hope this should be correct, actually my bad i overlooked the code, and thought its bug with flychek. :) thanks for helping. Both the commands you suggested above does work.

[purcell]

Great, glad you figured it out.