Skip to content

Conversation

@i-am-tom
Copy link

Adding a load of missing instances to Nullable. Unfortunately, a couple of these are necessary for us, but I think they're all correct. Not that I'm advocating their use, of course...

This commit adds an awful lot of new instances to the `Nullable` type.
While I'm certainly not suggesting that their use should be
_encouraged_, I think they are, nevertheless, valid implementations...
@i-am-tom
Copy link
Author

So, after talking on the Slack, this is certifiably a Bad Idea™ and, rather than tainting the type, I'll push for a refactor. 😳

@i-am-tom i-am-tom closed this Aug 17, 2017
@LiamGoodacre
Copy link
Member

One alternative might be to provide stand-alone versions of these functions - i.e: not as instances.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants