Skip to content

#2098 change averaging for SPMe+SR - #2099

Merged
brosaplanella merged 16 commits into
developfrom
issue-2098-SPMe-SR
Jul 27, 2022
Merged

brosaplanella merged 16 commits into
developfrom
issue-2098-SPMe-SR

Conversation

@brosaplanella

@brosaplanella brosaplanella commented Jun 9, 2022 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Changed the averaging for SEI, lithium plating and porosity submodels for SPM and SPMe. Wait to merge until the citation is updated.

Fixes #2098

Type of change

Please add a line in the relevant section of CHANGELOG.md to document the change (include PR #) - note reverse order of PR #s. If necessary, also add to the list of breaking changes.

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Optimization (back-end change that speeds up the code)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Key checklist:

  • No style issues: $ flake8
  • All tests pass: $ python run-tests.py --unit
  • The documentation builds: $ cd docs and then $ make clean; make html

You can run all three at once, using $ python run-tests.py --quick.

Further checks:

  • Code is commented, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • Tests added that prove fix is effective or that feature works

Comment thread pybamm/CITATIONS.txt Outdated
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 9, 2022 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #2099 (d7edf6f) into develop (9856785) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2099   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    99.35%   99.35%           
========================================
  Files          347      347           
  Lines        19241    19251   +10     
========================================
+ Hits         19117    19127   +10     
  Misses         124      124           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ls/LGM50_ORegan2022/aluminium_heat_capacity_CRC.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...cells/LGM50_ORegan2022/copper_heat_capacity_CRC.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...GM50_ORegan2022/copper_thermal_conductivity_CRC.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...graphite_ORegan2022/graphite_LGM50_ocp_Chen2020.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...lectrodes/nmc_ORegan2022/nmc_LGM50_ocp_Chen2020.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...amm/models/full_battery_models/lithium_ion/spme.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...Regan2022/graphite_LGM50_diffusivity_ORegan2022.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...electrolyte_exchange_current_density_ORegan2022.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...n2022/graphite_LGM50_entropic_change_ORegan2022.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...gan2022/graphite_LGM50_heat_capacity_ORegan2022.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 12 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9856785...d7edf6f. Read the comment docs.

@valentinsulzer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I have a few questions about this, let's go over it in the Monday meeting

@brosaplanella

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I have a few questions about this, let's go over it in the Monday meeting

I will miss the next two meetings, but there's no rush on this so happy to chat about when I am back.

@valentinsulzer valentinsulzer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, just the change discussed in meeting

Comment thread pybamm/models/full_battery_models/lithium_ion/base_lithium_ion_model.py Outdated
@brosaplanella

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Note that I have updated ORegan2021 to ORegan2022 now that it has been published, hence all the files modified.

Comment thread pybamm/models/full_battery_models/lithium_ion/spme.py Outdated

@valentinsulzer valentinsulzer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, looks good!

* "x-average side reactions": str
Whether to average the side reactions (SEI growth, lithium plating and
the respective porosity change) over the x-axis in Single Particle
Models, can be "false" (default) or "true".

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldn't it be true for SPM? I think it won't make a difference to results, but will be faster

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I have fixed it now, take a look. It is a bit messy at the moment, hopefully will be clearer once we have derived the SPMe for cracks and loss of active material submodels.

@valentinsulzer valentinsulzer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

merge whenever ready

@brosaplanella
brosaplanella merged commit dfe6a46 into develop Jul 27, 2022
@brosaplanella
brosaplanella deleted the issue-2098-SPMe-SR branch July 27, 2022 15:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SPM(e) with SEI growth or lithium plating

2 participants