Skip to content

add a few more expression simplifications - #2211

Merged
valentinsulzer merged 12 commits into
developfrom
more-expression-simplifications
Oct 10, 2022
Merged

valentinsulzer merged 12 commits into
developfrom
more-expression-simplifications

Conversation

@valentinsulzer

@valentinsulzer valentinsulzer commented Aug 2, 2022 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

A few more simplifications of the expression tree. Spotted these while debugging but I doubt they will be very common

Type of change

Please add a line in the relevant section of CHANGELOG.md to document the change (include PR #) - note reverse order of PR #s. If necessary, also add to the list of breaking changes.

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Optimization (back-end change that speeds up the code)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Key checklist:

  • No style issues: $ flake8
  • All tests pass: $ python run-tests.py --unit
  • The documentation builds: $ cd docs and then $ make clean; make html

You can run all three at once, using $ python run-tests.py --quick.

Further checks:

  • Code is commented, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • Tests added that prove fix is effective or that feature works

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 3, 2022 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 99.64% // Head: 99.64% // Increases project coverage by +0.00% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (e28b196) compared to base (82a705c).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2211   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    99.64%   99.64%           
========================================
  Files          361      361           
  Lines        19918    19932   +14     
========================================
+ Hits         19847    19861   +14     
  Misses          71       71           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pybamm/expression_tree/binary_operators.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pybamm/expression_tree/state_vector.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

r_left, r_right = right.orphans
return (left * r_right) / r_left

# Cancelling out common terms

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aren't there more simplifications here? I think this catches things like (a*b)/(a*c) but wouldn't catch (b*a)/(c*a)? Is it much overhead to check for these?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, just adding things as I see them come up in expression trees

# Or simplify A @ (B @ b +- C @ c) to (A @ B @ b) +- (A @ C @ c) if (A @ B)
# and (A @ C) are constant
# Don't do this if either b or c is a number as this will lead to matmul errors
if (

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need A to be constant here too? I.e. left.is_constant()?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, good point

@valentinsulzer
valentinsulzer requested a review from rtimms October 7, 2022 15:32

@rtimms rtimms left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks, looks good!

@valentinsulzer
valentinsulzer merged commit dbc7a6c into develop Oct 10, 2022
@valentinsulzer
valentinsulzer deleted the more-expression-simplifications branch October 10, 2022 15:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants