Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sphinx configuration should share PyB at runtime #398 #399

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2016

Conversation

arcivanov
Copy link
Member

fixes #398, connected to #398

@mriehl
Copy link
Member

mriehl commented Sep 16, 2016

👍 LGTM, cc @locolupo

@arcivanov arcivanov force-pushed the issue_398 branch 8 times, most recently from 7fb239a to fd9a194 Compare September 16, 2016 12:00
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 16, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.6%) to 72.765% when pulling 57351e5 on arcivanov:issue_398 into feaf5ee on pybuilder:master.

@arcivanov arcivanov merged commit 3f85af0 into pybuilder:master Sep 16, 2016
@arcivanov arcivanov deleted the issue_398 branch September 16, 2016 12:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Sphinx configuration should share PyB at runtime
3 participants