Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sphinx configuration should share PyB at runtime #398 #399

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2016


Copy link

fixes #398, connected to #398

Copy link

mriehl commented Sep 16, 2016

👍 LGTM, cc @locolupo

@arcivanov arcivanov force-pushed the issue_398 branch 8 times, most recently from 7fb239a to fd9a194 Compare September 16, 2016 12:00
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 16, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.6%) to 72.765% when pulling 57351e5 on arcivanov:issue_398 into feaf5ee on pybuilder:master.

@arcivanov arcivanov merged commit 3f85af0 into pybuilder:master Sep 16, 2016
@arcivanov arcivanov deleted the issue_398 branch September 16, 2016 12:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
None yet

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Sphinx configuration should share PyB at runtime
3 participants