FIX: Max phases by Gibbs phase rule accommodated #184
This requires a hack in
Does this still work if you set the maximum number of phases to c+1 instead of c+2? I support this change, but I want to note that the current implementation already respects the Gibbs phase rule, which is
The reason we want to artificially increase the maximum phases allowed is because we want to accommodate the degenerate degree of freedom at the invariant reactions. (The solution this change gives will be "correct," but the phase fractions won't be meaningful since multiple values would give the same Gibbs energy on the invariant line.)
…ctions and the result_simplex. The failing test case passes.