From ab4d1071d0f61e15ecd552183c0920c9540ea8f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Viktor=20Sz=C3=A9pe?= <viktor@szepe.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 08:58:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix typos (#8356)

---
 pydantic/_internal/_generics.py | 2 +-
 pydantic/fields.py              | 2 +-
 pydantic/v1/fields.py           | 2 +-
 tests/test_main.py              | 2 +-
 tests/test_types_typeddict.py   | 2 +-
 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/pydantic/_internal/_generics.py b/pydantic/_internal/_generics.py
index c1200d0c9d..5a66eaa957 100644
--- a/pydantic/_internal/_generics.py
+++ b/pydantic/_internal/_generics.py
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ def _get_caller_frame_info(depth: int = 2) -> tuple[str | None, bool]:
         depth: The depth to get the frame.
 
     Returns:
-        A tuple contains `module_nam` and `called_globally`.
+        A tuple contains `module_name` and `called_globally`.
 
     Raises:
         RuntimeError: If the function is not called inside a function.
diff --git a/pydantic/fields.py b/pydantic/fields.py
index 40819551ef..1881143569 100644
--- a/pydantic/fields.py
+++ b/pydantic/fields.py
@@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ def _wrapped_property_is_private(property_: cached_property | property) -> bool:
     return wrapped_name.startswith('_') and not wrapped_name.startswith('__')
 
 
-# this should really be `property[T], cached_proprety[T]` but property is not generic unlike cached_property
+# this should really be `property[T], cached_property[T]` but property is not generic unlike cached_property
 # See https://github.com/python/typing/issues/985 and linked issues
 PropertyT = typing.TypeVar('PropertyT')
 
diff --git a/pydantic/v1/fields.py b/pydantic/v1/fields.py
index b1856c109c..607bbd7b8e 100644
--- a/pydantic/v1/fields.py
+++ b/pydantic/v1/fields.py
@@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ def populate_validators(self) -> None:
         """
         Prepare self.pre_validators, self.validators, and self.post_validators based on self.type_'s  __get_validators__
         and class validators. This method should be idempotent, e.g. it should be safe to call multiple times
-        without mis-configuring the field.
+        without misconfiguring the field.
         """
         self.validate_always = getattr(self.type_, 'validate_always', False) or any(
             v.always for v in self.class_validators.values()
diff --git a/tests/test_main.py b/tests/test_main.py
index 5b755a68cc..f2477013d3 100644
--- a/tests/test_main.py
+++ b/tests/test_main.py
@@ -1533,7 +1533,7 @@ class Sub(BaseModel):
         s4: str = 'v4'
 
     class Parent(BaseModel):
-        # b will be included since fields are set idependently
+        # b will be included since fields are set independently
         model_config = ConfigDict(fields={'b': {'include': ...}})
         a: int
         b: int
diff --git a/tests/test_types_typeddict.py b/tests/test_types_typeddict.py
index 8a0dfbc0af..a57ae22857 100644
--- a/tests/test_types_typeddict.py
+++ b/tests/test_types_typeddict.py
@@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ class Model(BaseModel):
     ]
 
 
-def test_typeddict_inheritence(TypedDict: Any) -> None:
+def test_typeddict_inheritance(TypedDict: Any) -> None:
     class Parent(TypedDict):
         x: int