-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
Properly support PEP 695 generics syntax #11189
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Reword relevant docstrings and comments.
Deploying pydantic-docs with
|
| Latest commit: |
308670a
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://bea518c3.pydantic-docs.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://pep695-support.pydantic-docs.pages.dev |
It was added for coverage purposes, but is fragile because it tests the implementation, not the functionality. As a consequence, it broke with the added logic in `parent_frame_namespace`. `test_module_ns_is_none` was rewritten to be self-contained.
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #11189 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
ea6f387 to
6294423
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Best to be reviewed visually. The example was simplified a bit (avoid using lists, etc)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
New docs look great. I left a few minor requests for changes.
I'm impressed that the diff is this minimal for supporting this syntax!
0ad7a5c to
308670a
Compare
Best reviewed commit per commit.
Reword relevant docstrings and comments.
Fixes #11031.
Fixes #9782.
Change Summary
Related issue number
Checklist