Remove unecessary note in errors documentation

[fhightower]

Hello! I assume this is trivial enough to not require an issue/discussion, but happy to raise an issue if desired.

Change Summary

Update the note on datetime_from_date_parsing which was referencing an old version of pydantic as if it is yet to be released.

Checklist

• The pull request title is a good summary of the changes - it will be used in the changelog
• Unit tests for the changes exist
• Tests pass on CI
• Documentation reflects the changes where applicable
• My PR is ready to review, please add a comment including the phrase "please review" to assign reviewers

[fhightower]

please review - thanks!

[hyperlint-ai]

PR Change Summary

Updated documentation to reflect that support for parsing datetimes from specific date formats has already been released in a previous version.

• Revised note in the validation errors documentation regarding datetime parsing support
• Clarified that support for parsing datetimes from 'yyyy-MM-DD' dates was added in version 2.6.0

Modified Files

• docs/errors/validation_errors.md

---

How can I customize these reviews?

Check out the Hyperlint AI Reviewer docs for more information on how to customize the review.

If you just want to ignore it on this PR, you can add the hyperlint-ignore label to the PR. Future changes won't trigger a Hyperlint review.

Note specifically for link checks, we only check the first 30 links in a file and we cache the results for several hours (for instance, if you just added a page, you might experience this). Our recommendation is to add hyperlint-ignore to the PR to ignore the link check for this PR.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #11722 will not alter performance

_{Comparing fhightower:remove-old-docs-warning (e8b1a48) with main (2e7cddb)}

Summary

✅ 46 untouched benchmarks

[github-actions]

Coverage report

This PR does not seem to contain any modification to coverable code.

[Viicos]

Thanks, I think we can just remove the note entirely.