check for invalid validators #140
Merged
+64
−18
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #140 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 100% 100%
=====================================
Files 9 9
Lines 879 893 +14
Branches 197 199 +2
=====================================
+ Hits 879 893 +14 |
alexdrydew
pushed a commit
to alexdrydew/pydantic
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 23, 2023
* fix recursion cycle edge case * improve validator names * simplifying validator names * all tests passing * implementing complete via RefCell - failed * names working correctly * fixing all validator names * function names and testing function recursion * correct dict validator name * backup recursion guard, fix pydantic#143 * cleanup * fix rust benchmarks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fix #103, ref #137