New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BUG: replace should handle Bool blocks correctly #6332
Comments
Are we ever going to get an integer or bool NaN? I'm haven't followed any developments in this. |
its not that difficult if you use a Then of course you would have to go thru lots of routines and deal with the special handling (that is implicity in that you know that int64 if its a dtype of int64 cannot right now have a missing value). so would have to have someone with lots of time to do this! up for it @TomAugspurger ? |
I wasn't volunteering :) Maybe someday. I was just asking because I was thinking about skipping |
@TomAugspurger yep....that's makes sense for interpolate for sure |
technically |
@cpcloud want 2 take this? |
Happy to fix the bool issue here. Not going to implement inans or bool nans |
hah! that's what I meant :) FYI also need to test case where u are replacing say True with a value (which prob will switch dtype) |
weird just those no-op cases fail ... the other cases work |
into the cave of replace we go 😄 |
@jreback Turns out it's not an issue with blocks or |
If you can wait until 10:00a I can fix it :) Otherwise feel free to revert. |
I thought this passed earlier ... I'm not going crazy am I? |
np...take time....maybe somehow random? |
hmm...went away in latest master.....random maybe? |
yeah ... i actually can't really work on this ATM .... tried to do it on windows but taking too much just to get the friggin thing setup |
can investigate tonight |
hahha...ok...np...lmk |
popped up again.....weird... |
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21733802/pandas-series-replace-on-boolean-series
by definition they don't have missing values
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: