New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cerberus 1.0 Support #776
Comments
I plan on supporting Cerberus 0.10 because it is better on all accounts. I have been hesitant however since it breaks backward compatibility in a big way so it is going to require a bit of work and, worse, will probably break most custom validators, making the upgrade to next Eve release a pain point. I did not have the time to experiment with the update though so please feel free to play with it and submit a PR, if you feel like doing it. |
I would like to second the request for 1.0 support. I think the advances in Cerberus 1.x would be great to have in Python-Eve. In my case the recursive schema definitions is needed. |
I've started playing with this. It will probably take some time, though. I am planning to post an update on this within one or two weeks. |
@dkellner excellent! |
See #1001 |
This issue is a bit premature as Cerberus 0.10 has yet to be released, but I'm curious what the plan is for updating Eve to use it? Is there any timeline in mind? I'm eager to see the impact on validation performance - it seems like there could be some significant improvements in the new code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: