Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve GeoJSON validation #1004

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from
Closed

Improve GeoJSON validation #1004

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

Martin456
Copy link
Contributor

  • New config variable to allow custom fields in GeoJSON (Issue GeoJson types limited to 2 fields #769)
  • Validation if coordinates contain at least two values
  • Support for Feature and FeatureCollection structures

Martin FOUS (contractor) and others added 5 commits March 7, 2017 18:29
- New config variable to allow custom fields in GeoJSON (Issue pyeve#769)
- Validation if coordinates contain at least two values
- Support for Feature and FeatureCollection structures
Copy link
Member

@nicolaiarocci nicolaiarocci left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Excellent. The geo section in the docs should also be updated though.

@nicolaiarocci nicolaiarocci added this to the 0.8 milestone Mar 27, 2017
@Martin456
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll update documentation tonight, thank you

@nicolaiarocci
Copy link
Member

Thanks. Will be merge when we're ready for 0.8 release

nicolaiarocci added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2017
@nicolaiarocci
Copy link
Member

Merged to branch v0.8: ca724e6

Thanks!

nicolaiarocci added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2017
nicolaiarocci added a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2017
nicolaiarocci added a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants