New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ExpressionFunction] add components of mu to locals #314

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 28, 2016

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@sdrave
Copy link
Member

sdrave commented Oct 27, 2016

This makes defining ExpressionFunctions much more elegant. Also, we already do the same for ExpressionParameterFunctional.

@coveralls

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 27, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 81.11% when pulling 473b2d9 on expressionfunction_params into b00faf1 on master.

@sdrave sdrave merged commit d82dfd9 into master Oct 28, 2016

2 of 3 checks passed

continuous-integration/travis-ci/push The Travis CI build could not complete due to an error
Details
code-quality/landscape Landscape has completed the code quality check
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details

@sdrave sdrave deleted the expressionfunction_params branch Oct 28, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment