Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Idea: using YAML instead of TOML #53

Closed
refi64 opened this issue Jan 23, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

Idea: using YAML instead of TOML #53

refi64 opened this issue Jan 23, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@refi64
Copy link

refi64 commented Jan 23, 2017

Kind of like shards does. It's quite a bit more concise than TOML and even looks kind of Python-y.

I know the answer to this is probably going to be "big change, not enough gain", "conciseness isn't a good reason to switch", "harder to parse", etc...but I figured this still is worth a shot. ;)

@kennethreitz
Copy link
Contributor

toml is being used by other packaging standards in python, so we're sticking to it.

@edmorley
Copy link

eg TOML was picked in PEP518 - see the discussion there for reasons:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0518/#other-file-formats

@frob
Copy link

frob commented Jun 29, 2017

I don't see it argued anywhere that maybe using an unfinished standard, such as TOML, might pose a problem long term.

@thechief389
Copy link

I'd rather have it support both.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants