Relay the moderator's reason for !superstarify to the user#1319
Conversation
Previously, the infraction DM from the bot gave a formulaic message about the nickname policy. It now gives a slightly different message along with the reason given by the mod. This means that the message the user gets and the infraction reason that gets recorded are now the same.
…wfarnsworth/superstar
Whereas one of my previous commits makes the message the user gets and the infraction that gets recorded the same, the recorded infraction is now shorter, but the message the user gets is more similar to the embed posted in the public channel. We also softened the language of the user-facing message a bit.
swfarnsworth
added
the
a: moderation
|
Here's an alternative message (I have not committed or pushed this yet):
This is the DM that they get: This is what the mod would see in the user's infraction history: |
|
Per @mbaruh's suggestion, I made another change whereby the "Additional details: " portion of the message does not appear in the embed displayed in the channel (since it's just restating what the mod wrote in the command), whereas the message still appears in the message sent to the user. The messages are otherwise the same. |
|
Per an internal discussion, we'll retain the original wording of the embed, but the title will still be "Superstarify!" instead of "Congratulations!" |
ghost
added
s: waiting for author
… "Superstarified!" Per internal staff discussion, we'll keep the wording of the message.
|
The public embed is always the same: The infraction message depends on whether or not the mod gave a reason:
The message in the infraction history is unchanged from the previous set of screenshots. |
ghost
added
needs 2 approvals
and removed
s: waiting for author
| f"You will be unable to change your nickname until **{expiry_str}**. " | ||
| "If you're confused by this, please read our " | ||
| f"[official nickname policy]({NICKNAME_POLICY_URL})." | ||
| ).format |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This feels a bit unconventional and odd, but it's quite smart.
5 participants
This PR closes issue #1224.
Previously, when a moderator used the
!superstarifycommand, the reason they gave only gets recorded in the user's infraction history and is not relayed to the user in the direct message sent by the bot. This PR changes the message the user is sent to fix this.However, we're discussing if the special embed that gets posted in the channel where the command is issued is actually appropriate.