Skip to content
Permalink
Browse files

bpo-33459: Fix "tuple displays" term in Expressions.rst (GH-6760)

  • Loading branch information...
andresdelfino authored and miss-islington committed Sep 11, 2019
1 parent a828514 commit dc269971091710563a0d730a0d4b084901826c15
Showing with 4 additions and 4 deletions.
  1. +4 −4 Doc/reference/expressions.rst
@@ -148,9 +148,8 @@ immutable, the same rules as for literals apply (i.e., two occurrences of the em
tuple may or may not yield the same object).

.. index::
single: comma; tuple display
pair: tuple; display
single: , (comma); tuple display
single: comma
single: , (comma)

Note that tuples are not formed by the parentheses, but rather by use of the
comma operator. The exception is the empty tuple, for which parentheses *are*
@@ -1822,7 +1821,8 @@ precedence and have a left-to-right chaining feature as described in the
| ``x[index]``, ``x[index:index]``, | Subscription, slicing, |
| ``x(arguments...)``, ``x.attribute`` | call, attribute reference |
+-----------------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| ``(expressions...)``, | Binding or tuple display, |
| ``(expressions...)``, | Binding or parenthesized |
| | expression, |
| ``[expressions...]``, | list display, |
| ``{key: value...}``, | dictionary display, |
| ``{expressions...}`` | set display |

0 comments on commit dc26997

Please sign in to comment.
You can’t perform that action at this time.