We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and
privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?
to your account
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2010-01-01.16:12:34.955>
created_at = <Date 2009-07-15.17:18:05.768>
labels = ['build']
title = 'Improve --with-dbmliborder option'
updated_at = <Date 2010-01-01.16:12:34.953>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/Arfrever'
activity = <Date 2010-01-01.16:12:34.953>
actor = 'benjamin.peterson'
assignee = 'none'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2010-01-01.16:12:34.955>
closer = 'benjamin.peterson'
components = ['Build']
creation = <Date 2009-07-15.17:18:05.768>
creator = 'Arfrever'
dependencies = 
files = ['14501']
hgrepos = 
issue_num = 6491
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 2.0
messages = ['90539', '97117']
nosy_count = 3.0
nosy_names = ['benjamin.peterson', 'djc', 'Arfrever']
pr_nums = 
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'accepted'
stage = None
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue6491'
versions = ['Python 3.1', 'Python 2.7']
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
--with-dbmliborder option doesn't allow to specify that no dbm modules
are requested. It also doesn't affect "Anthony Baxter's gdbm module".
The attached patch allows to specify "--with-dbmliborder=" which should
disable building of all dbm modules.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Applied in r77215.
No branches or pull requests