-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
new selectors module should support devpoll on Solaris #63131
Comments
This is a follow up of bpo-16853. |
Patch is in attachment. |
Just to let you know that I'm not forgetting this issue. |
@giampaolo: Your patch doesn't apply cleanly anymore. Could you update it? Issue bpo-19172 has been fixed, selectors now have a get_map() method. |
We missed 3.4 :-(. Targeting Python 3.5 now. Giampaolo, could you possibly refresh your patch?. Thanks. |
Sorry for not being able to rewrite the patch in time for 3.4. |
I actually prefer some code duplication in this case. Makes the review
|
OK, I will provide a patch soon. |
BDFL talked :-). I can test the patch on a Solaris box, and Python has OpenSolaris buildbots. |
Patch in attachment. |
Could you regenerate it without --git (it doesn't show under the review |
Why there is no 'review' link for the new patch? |
review links are only generated for patches that apply cleanly (I don't On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Yury Selivanov <report@bugs.python.org>wrote:
|
Regenerated without --git. |
Still no review link. Somehow you managed to upload the first patch correctly. Does the new one apply cleanly on the default branch? |
"hg import http://bugs.python.org/file34522/devpoll3.patch" applies cleanly for me. Not sure what else to do. |
LGTM, but I don't have a Solaris box to test. I suppose one of you has tested this? Then okay to commit to the default (== 3.5) branch. |
New changeset 0a51a516bc70 by Giampaolo Rodola' in branch 'default': |
I successfully tested this on Solaris 11. |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: