-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Raise ImportWarning when loader.load_module() is used #70319
Comments
Since loader.load_module() is documented as deprecated, we should consider raising an ImportWarning when it is used. That way when Python 2.7 support ends we can either remove it or have one more release where the various ImportWarnings turn into DeprecationWarnings and we finally clean up the import semantics to only be spec-based. |
@brett Since this was opened like years ago. Before I work on it, I was wondering If it is still relevant. |
@joannah no clue if this ever happened. Could you check the code if DeprecationWarning is being raised yet? |
I checked out the source (Lib/imp.py:219) and only see the docstring marking this method als Deprecated. No exceptions are being raised. I would like to work on this issue. |
Clarification: the imp module shows a DeprecationWarning when imported. Was this what was meant? |
Feel free to open a PR. |
If you look at https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Lib/importlib/_bootstrap.py and https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Lib/importlib/_bootstrap_external.py you will notice a bunch of comments near all the calls to load_module(). Those are the places that should be somehow triggering a DeprecationWarning. I think there's a compatibility shim function which would need to raise an exception so that anyone who has implemented load_module() as the only way to handle loading get a warning (but I think that requires certain loaders to have appropriate support which hopefully they have already but someone needs to double-check). After that every implementation of load_module() should have a warning. |
A PR is now up. I ended up deprecating the load_module() methods in importlib itself and then raise ImportWarning in the import system itself when falling back to load_module(). |
I'm seeing the following test failure locally on master (doesn't seem to be showing up in CI though). I'm not too familiar with this stuff, but it looks related to this change: ====================================================================== Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/bucher/src/cpython/Lib/test/test___all__.py", line 55, in check_all
self.assertEqual(keys, all_set, "in module {}".format(modname))
File "/home/bucher/src/cpython/Lib/contextlib.py", line 140, in __exit__
next(self.gen)
File "/home/bucher/src/cpython/Lib/test/support/warnings_helper.py", line 177, in _filterwarnings
raise AssertionError("unhandled warning %s" % reraise[0])
AssertionError: unhandled warning {message : ImportWarning('VendorImporter.exec_module() not found; falling back to load_module()'), category : 'ImportWarning', filename : '<frozen importlib._bootstrap>', lineno : 681, line : None} Should we be ignoring the new warning in this test as well? I'm still not sure why I seem to be the only one seeing it. |
What is "VendorImporter" (see the message of the ImportWarning)? That's not in the stdlib, so it looks like your system is injecting something via some |
Yep, looks like that was it. Thanks! |
@brett.cannon |
I wrote benjaminp/six#343 to fix the six module. I would appreciate a review. |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: