-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.7k
dict views don't implement subtraction correctly #70665
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Don't know when the problem was introduced, but dictviews_sub is doing: tmp = _PyObject_CallMethodId(result, &PyId_difference_update, "O", other); to implement subtraction (after creating result as a set of the keys in question). That's violating the CallMethod contract though (which states the format string should produce a tuple), and while it looks like CallMethod does fixups when the contract is violated, this creates some very odd behaviors. With a list, everything is fine: >>> d = {0: 'zero', 1: 'one', 2: 'two', 3: 'three'}
>>> d.keys() - [0, 2]
{1, 3}
>>> d.keys() - (0, 2)
TypeError: 'int' object is not iterable Basically, the fix up doesn't get applied when you subtract a tuple, so it's as if it's trying to call: result.difference_update(*(0, 2)) # Unpacking used to illustrate, effect is result.difference_update(0, 2) With the list, it's wrapping to make a one element tuple, so it behaves like: result.difference_update(*([0, 2],)) # Unpacking used to illustrate, effect is result.difference_update([0, 2]) For more details, see http://stackoverflow.com/q/35784258/364696 Fix should be to change call line to: tmp = _PyObject_CallMethodObjArgsId(result, &PyId_difference_update, other, NULL); (assuming _PyObject_CallMethodObjArgsId is a thing), or if it's not a thing, to fix the format string to force tuple wrapping: tmp = _PyObject_CallMethodId(result, &PyId_difference_update, "(O)", other); |
New changeset 0cae6b6e3d7d by Benjamin Peterson in branch '3.4': New changeset a5bc5c9490f5 by Benjamin Peterson in branch '3.5': New changeset 9532a8815a9c by Benjamin Peterson in branch 'default': |
Well that was patched quickly, impressive turnaround on this |
New changeset 309f3559a729 by Benjamin Peterson in branch '2.7': |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: