-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
implement PEP 552 #75831
Comments
Now that PEP-552 is accepted, we'll need an actual implementation. Besides the core import changes, there are some perquisites improvements. For one, our SipHash implementation needs to be changed to accept an arbitrary key. Also, the PEP also introduces the first "long" option to the interpreter, so the getopt implementation will have to be enhanced. |
While we are here, can other changes be made?
|
On Sat, Dec 9, 2017, at 01:06, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
All these suggestions seem fine, but they're not in the PEP and the gps also points out we should expand the timestamp field to 64 bits for |
Failure on Python on s390x RHEL 3.x: http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/21/builds/340 ====================================================================== Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.x.edelsohn-rhel-z/build/Lib/test/test_imp.py", line 335, in test_source_hash
self.assertEqual(_imp.source_hash(42, b'hi'), b'\xc6\xe7Z\r\x03:}\xab')
AssertionError: b'Yb\x91||\x91bY' != b'\xc6\xe7Z\r\x03:}\xab' |
Looks fine to me now? http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/21 |
The test failed on s390x RHEL 3.x, PPC64 Fedora 3.x, s390x SLES 3.x, s390x Debian 3.x, s390x RHEL 3.x They are now all green, good! |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: