Base.x has a value (it's the member_descriptor for x). That's what's causing the problem that when adding a field to the derived class, it thinks you're adding a field without a default value after one that has a default value.
I agree that I could detect this specific case and allow it. My comment about the error message was inaccurate.
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: