-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simple HTTP Request Handler in http.server does not set a content-length and does not close connections on 301s #88138
Comments
If you use the For example, if "foo/" is a directory under the file server, a GET for "/foo" will receive a 301 Moved Permanently response with a Location header pointing at "/foo/". However, the response is sent without a "Content-Length: 0" and the connection is not closed. Unfortunately, certain clients will hang indefinitely and wait under these conditions, without processing the redirect. In my testing, curl 7.68 and Firefox 87 both exhibted this behavior. If a Content-Length header is set, these clients behave correctly. def send_response(self, code):
super().send_response(code)
if code == HTTPStatus.MOVED_PERMANENTLY:
self.send_header("Content-Length", "0") |
Hi Stephen, Could you give a brief demo of using curl to see the problematic behavior. I have testing with a version python and saw that without content length, the curl was behaving properly.
And
|
Ach! Sorry! I didn't even realize this but the issue only arises when you are modifying the handler to set the protocol to HTTP/1.1 . In HTTP/1.0 , there's no notion of persistent connections, so the issue does not arise. But when the protocol version changes to 1.1 , persistent connections are the norm, and curl will wait indefinitely. The following short script is sufficient to reproduce:
After double-checking the docs, the current doc for I still think the fix I proposed is an improvement. Setting a Content-Length isn't forbidden in HTTP/1.0 , and it guarantees good behavior when HTTP/1.1 is used. |
Hi Stephen, With the example, I couldn't reproduce the problem with curl 7.65.3 That said, I do recognize that this change is a positive improvement, but I cannot see this a bug-fix (and for client misbehavior, which I couldn't verify). To take a call, I think, this change could go into Note: the existing behavior is 10+ year old and don't want to introduce changes if it is not a bug. Thanks |
I am also hesitant to fix something that is not broken. So, please share the broken behavior that could be verified, and this will give us greater confidence to commit this patch. |
Thanks for working with me to reproduce and understand the issue. I'm a little surprised that with the sample which sets the protocol version you're still not seeing the issue. If I create a directory tree, e.g. repro where Full verbose output:
This holds over a few python versions: 3.6.12, 3.8.5, and 3.9.1 . That's probably a good enough sample since the relevant code hasn't changed in the stdlib. It's doubtful that the exact version of curl matters for this. I can also see the issue with Firefox opening Running the sample I gave, you're seeing curl exit cleanly? I wonder, with verbose output, maybe there's some useful message that will tell us why it's exiting. Does it not print the message, "no chunk, no close, no size. Assume close to signal end" ?
I completely understand this stance. I believe it is a bug, but that it's rare enough that hasn't been filed or resolved, in spite of its age. Some browsers (e.g. Chrome) process redirects without waiting for a payload, so they would mask the issue. Plus, it only shows up when the protocol_version is set. I had a script at work with this issue for over a year without anyone running into the hangs. A coworker who prefers Firefox noticed the issue only recently, and I traced that back to this behavior. |
Hi Stephen, Thanks for the response and the details. I was able to verify the bug! Thanks, |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: