We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and
privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?
to your account
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2021-08-17.23:40:07.123>
created_at = <Date 2021-08-17.13:51:47.201>
labels = ['library', '3.10', '3.11']
title = 'Solaris: enable posix_spawn in subprocess'
updated_at = <Date 2021-08-17.23:40:07.123>
user = 'https://github.com/kulikjak'
activity = <Date 2021-08-17.23:40:07.123>
actor = 'gregory.p.smith'
assignee = 'none'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2021-08-17.23:40:07.123>
closer = 'gregory.p.smith'
components = ['Library (Lib)']
creation = <Date 2021-08-17.13:51:47.201>
creator = 'kulikjak'
dependencies = 
files = 
hgrepos = 
issue_num = 44935
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 3.0
messages = ['399750', '399778', '399780']
nosy_count = 3.0
nosy_names = ['gregory.p.smith', 'miss-islington', 'kulikjak']
pr_nums = ['27795', '27800']
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'fixed'
stage = 'commit review'
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue44935'
versions = ['Python 3.10', 'Python 3.11']
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Solaris also provides posix_spawn() syscall that can/should be used in the subprocess module to spawn new processes.
Sorry, something went wrong.
New changeset b1930bf by Jakub Kulík in branch 'main':
bpo-44935: enable posix_spawn() on Solaris (GH-27795)
New changeset 826e059 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.10':
[3.10] bpo-44935: enable posix_spawn() on Solaris (GH-27795) (GH-27800)
No branches or pull requests