Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.6] bpo-29564:_PyMem_DumpTraceback() suggests enabling tracemalloc (GH-10510) #10515

Closed

Conversation

@miss-islington
Copy link

miss-islington commented Nov 13, 2018

If tracemalloc is not tracing Python memory allocations,
_PyMem_DumpTraceback() now suggests to enable tracemalloc
to get the traceback where the memory block has been allocated.
(cherry picked from commit f966e53)

Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner vstinner@redhat.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue29564

)

If tracemalloc is not tracing Python memory allocations,
_PyMem_DumpTraceback() now suggests to enable tracemalloc
to get the traceback where the memory block has been allocated.
(cherry picked from commit f966e53)

Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <vstinner@redhat.com>
Copy link
Member

vstinner left a comment

Oh, _Py_tracemalloc_config doesn't exist in Python 3.6.

@bedevere-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

bedevere-bot commented Nov 13, 2018

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@vstinner vstinner closed this Nov 13, 2018
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the miss-islington:backport-f966e53-3.6 branch Nov 13, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.