From 3772ac5a6a3ef5ff9367932870c2f4338e45f5a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: decorator-factory <42166884+decorator-factory@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 19:34:08 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Replace the term `Immutable` with a `Hashable` in the
 `sequence` entry of the Glossary (GH-124350)

The term `Immutable` in the `sequence` entry of the glossary is used incorrectly, in fact dicts accepts hashable keys, which is not the same as immutable.
(cherry picked from commit 6203ef35dd4ee9dd59759ce83eace8eacac69685)

Co-authored-by: decorator-factory <42166884+decorator-factory@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 Doc/glossary.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Doc/glossary.rst b/Doc/glossary.rst
index c85370fec84aea..01d126830b7085 100644
--- a/Doc/glossary.rst
+++ b/Doc/glossary.rst
@@ -1106,7 +1106,7 @@ Glossary
       :class:`tuple`, and :class:`bytes`. Note that :class:`dict` also
       supports :meth:`~object.__getitem__` and :meth:`!__len__`, but is considered a
       mapping rather than a sequence because the lookups use arbitrary
-      :term:`immutable` keys rather than integers.
+      :term:`hashable` keys rather than integers.
 
       The :class:`collections.abc.Sequence` abstract base class
       defines a much richer interface that goes beyond just