From 6c85bb0f2065cf2f18c892435ad50378f2bd5974 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Greg Price Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:46:22 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Correct Roman-numeral example in Unicode HOWTO. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit We had the character Ⅶ aka U+2166 ROMAN NUMERAL SEVEN, but the code point given is 2167 and it's next to 2168. Adjust so the code point, character, and name all agree. (This follows up on 77df9a157, which made the name match the character.) We also had a mixture of `;` and `:` for a delimiter. It doesn't really matter which, but it's good to be consistent. The actual Unicode database files use `;`, so go with that. --- Doc/howto/unicode.rst | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/Doc/howto/unicode.rst b/Doc/howto/unicode.rst index d5632bc799d2de..51bd64bfc232ca 100644 --- a/Doc/howto/unicode.rst +++ b/Doc/howto/unicode.rst @@ -57,14 +57,14 @@ their corresponding code points: ... 007B '{'; LEFT CURLY BRACKET ... - 2167 'Ⅶ': ROMAN NUMERAL SEVEN - 2168 'Ⅸ': ROMAN NUMERAL NINE + 2167 'Ⅷ'; ROMAN NUMERAL EIGHT + 2168 'Ⅸ'; ROMAN NUMERAL NINE ... - 265E '♞': BLACK CHESS KNIGHT - 265F '♟': BLACK CHESS PAWN + 265E '♞'; BLACK CHESS KNIGHT + 265F '♟'; BLACK CHESS PAWN ... - 1F600 '😀': GRINNING FACE - 1F609 '😉': WINKING FACE + 1F600 '😀'; GRINNING FACE + 1F609 '😉'; WINKING FACE ... Strictly, these definitions imply that it's meaningless to say 'this is