New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-30907: improve "comparison to self" performance for containers #2679

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@wbolster

wbolster commented Jul 12, 2017

@the-knights-who-say-ni

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@the-knights-who-say-ni

the-knights-who-say-ni Jul 12, 2017

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately our records indicate you have not signed the CLA. For legal reasons we need you to sign this before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it!

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately our records indicate you have not signed the CLA. For legal reasons we need you to sign this before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it!

@wbolster wbolster changed the title from improve "comparison to self" performance for containers to [bpo-30907] improve "comparison to self" performance for containers Jul 12, 2017

@wbolster wbolster changed the title from [bpo-30907] improve "comparison to self" performance for containers to bpo-30907: improve "comparison to self" performance for containers Jul 12, 2017

@wbolster

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@wbolster

wbolster Jul 12, 2017

i have just completed the cla signing process.

i have just completed the cla signing process.

@wbolster

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@wbolster

wbolster Jul 12, 2017

is there anything i can do about this failing status check?

continuous-integration/appveyor/pr — AppVeyor was unable to build non-mergeable pull request

it seems the error is not on my side: this pr is based on current master, and has no merge problems.

is there anything i can do about this failing status check?

continuous-integration/appveyor/pr — AppVeyor was unable to build non-mergeable pull request

it seems the error is not on my side: this pr is based on current master, and has no merge problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment