Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP: new PEP] Use SPDX license expressions in Core package metadata #1148

Closed

Conversation

@pombredanne
Copy link

pombredanne commented Aug 15, 2019

This is a WIP PR for discussion around a PEP to add a new Core metadata field to document license in packages and eventually retire the use of the License and Classifiers.

This has been triggered by several recent or older discussions in particular:

Signed-off-by: Philippe Ombredanne pombredanne@nexb.com

pombredanne added 2 commits Aug 15, 2019
Signed-off-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
pypa/packaging-problems#41

Signed-off-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
@the-knights-who-say-ni

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

the-knights-who-say-ni commented Aug 15, 2019

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately we couldn't find an account corresponding to your GitHub username on bugs.python.org (b.p.o) to verify you have signed the CLA (this might be simply due to a missing "GitHub Name" entry in your b.p.o account settings). This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received.

Thanks again for your contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!

Signed-off-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
@pombredanne pombredanne mentioned this pull request Aug 15, 2019
@pombredanne

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

pombredanne commented Aug 15, 2019

@pombredanne

This comment has been minimized.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
pep-9999.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Reported-by: Aliaksei Urbanski @Jamim
Signed-off-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
And fix minor typo

Signed-off-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
@pombredanne

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

pombredanne commented Aug 16, 2019

Based on the recommendation of @cjerdonek I am closing this PR and will resubmit when the draft is ready https://discuss.python.org/t/improving-license-clarity-with-better-package-metadata/2154/24?u=pombredanne

The WIP pep will be at pombredanne#2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.