From e3efd28213897957c9c273ff5b6857a64a5718e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Blase Johnson Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 21:06:44 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] PEP 3119: Fixed typo --- pep-3119.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pep-3119.txt b/pep-3119.txt index a9824a2b844..16be3cf348a 100644 --- a/pep-3119.txt +++ b/pep-3119.txt @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ Overloading ``isinstance()`` and ``issubclass()`` During the development of this PEP and of its companion, PEP 3141, we repeatedly faced the choice between standardizing more, fine-grained -ABCs or fewer, course-grained ones. For example, at one stage, PEP +ABCs or fewer, coarse-grained ones. For example, at one stage, PEP 3141 introduced the following stack of base classes used for complex numbers: MonoidUnderPlus, AdditiveGroup, Ring, Field, Complex (each derived from the previous). And the discussion mentioned several