Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

resolve false negatives due to hashes in requirements file #248

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 20, 2020

Conversation

redshiftzero
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #227

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 4, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #248 into master will increase coverage by 0.14%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #248      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   74.28%   74.43%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files           7        7              
  Lines         350      352       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits          260      262       +2     
  Misses         90       90
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
safety/util.py 62.29% <100%> (+1.27%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 955de59...eabae18. Read the comment docs.

@rafaelpivato rafaelpivato self-assigned this Mar 20, 2020
@rafaelpivato rafaelpivato merged commit 0f3b9d8 into pyupio:master Mar 20, 2020
@rafaelpivato
Copy link
Contributor

This looks great. Thanks for that!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support requirements.txt with --hash
2 participants