New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better synchronization of runtime information with local client #44

Closed
ericmjonas opened this Issue Feb 21, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@ericmjonas
Collaborator

ericmjonas commented Feb 21, 2017

Right now, what modules to not upload is hardcoded. We should be able to do better than that, especially due to conda env. This is mostly a placeholder to keep the issue alive.

@ericmjonas

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ericmjonas

ericmjonas Feb 22, 2017

Collaborator

This actually shouldn't be that hard now that we have the runtime metadata and are validating it -- we could effectively replace the calls to preinstalled.

Collaborator

ericmjonas commented Feb 22, 2017

This actually shouldn't be that hard now that we have the runtime metadata and are validating it -- we could effectively replace the calls to preinstalled.

@ericmjonas ericmjonas closed this Feb 22, 2017

@ericmjonas ericmjonas reopened this Feb 22, 2017

@shivaram shivaram added this to the v0.2 milestone Mar 9, 2017

@shivaram

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@shivaram

shivaram Mar 9, 2017

Collaborator

This is part of the serialization cleanup

Collaborator

shivaram commented Mar 9, 2017

This is part of the serialization cleanup

@shivaram shivaram self-assigned this Mar 9, 2017

@shivaram

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@shivaram

shivaram Mar 20, 2017

Collaborator

@ericmjonas Am I right in understanding that you are also addressing this in the serialization-bugs branch ?

Collaborator

shivaram commented Mar 20, 2017

@ericmjonas Am I right in understanding that you are also addressing this in the serialization-bugs branch ?

@ericmjonas

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ericmjonas

ericmjonas Mar 20, 2017

Collaborator
Collaborator

ericmjonas commented Mar 20, 2017

ericmjonas added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2017

@ericmjonas ericmjonas closed this Mar 22, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment