contrib/libvhost-user: Fix bad printf format specifiers

We should use printf format specifier "%u" instead of "%d" for argument of type "unsigned int". Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com> Message-Id: <5FA28106.6000901@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
qemu · Nov 17, 2020 · 5fd6921 · 5fd6921
1 parent 727a063
commit 5fd6921
Showing 1 changed file with 12 additions and 12 deletions.
diff --git a/contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c b/contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c
@@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ vu_add_mem_reg(VuDev *dev, VhostUserMsg *vmsg) {
         return false;
     }
 
-    DPRINT("Adding region: %d\n", dev->nregions);
+    DPRINT("Adding region: %u\n", dev->nregions);
     DPRINT("    guest_phys_addr: 0x%016"PRIx64"\n",
            msg_region->guest_phys_addr);
     DPRINT("    memory_size:     0x%016"PRIx64"\n",
@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ vu_set_mem_table_exec_postcopy(VuDev *dev, VhostUserMsg *vmsg)
     VhostUserMemory m = vmsg->payload.memory, *memory = &m;
     dev->nregions = memory->nregions;
 
-    DPRINT("Nregions: %d\n", memory->nregions);
+    DPRINT("Nregions: %u\n", memory->nregions);
     for (i = 0; i < dev->nregions; i++) {
         void *mmap_addr;
         VhostUserMemoryRegion *msg_region = &memory->regions[i];
@@ -938,7 +938,7 @@ vu_set_mem_table_exec(VuDev *dev, VhostUserMsg *vmsg)
         return vu_set_mem_table_exec_postcopy(dev, vmsg);
     }
 
-    DPRINT("Nregions: %d\n", memory->nregions);
+    DPRINT("Nregions: %u\n", memory->nregions);
     for (i = 0; i < dev->nregions; i++) {
         void *mmap_addr;
         VhostUserMemoryRegion *msg_region = &memory->regions[i];
@@ -1049,8 +1049,8 @@ vu_set_vring_num_exec(VuDev *dev, VhostUserMsg *vmsg)
     unsigned int index = vmsg->payload.state.index;
     unsigned int num = vmsg->payload.state.num;
 
-    DPRINT("State.index: %d\n", index);
-    DPRINT("State.num:   %d\n", num);
+    DPRINT("State.index: %u\n", index);
+    DPRINT("State.num:   %u\n", num);
     dev->vq[index].vring.num = num;
 
     return false;
@@ -1105,8 +1105,8 @@ vu_set_vring_base_exec(VuDev *dev, VhostUserMsg *vmsg)
     unsigned int index = vmsg->payload.state.index;
     unsigned int num = vmsg->payload.state.num;
 
-    DPRINT("State.index: %d\n", index);
-    DPRINT("State.num:   %d\n", num);
+    DPRINT("State.index: %u\n", index);
+    DPRINT("State.num:   %u\n", num);
     dev->vq[index].shadow_avail_idx = dev->vq[index].last_avail_idx = num;
 
     return false;
@@ -1117,7 +1117,7 @@ vu_get_vring_base_exec(VuDev *dev, VhostUserMsg *vmsg)
 {
     unsigned int index = vmsg->payload.state.index;
 
-    DPRINT("State.index: %d\n", index);
+    DPRINT("State.index: %u\n", index);
     vmsg->payload.state.num = dev->vq[index].last_avail_idx;
     vmsg->size = sizeof(vmsg->payload.state);
 
@@ -1478,8 +1478,8 @@ vu_set_vring_enable_exec(VuDev *dev, VhostUserMsg *vmsg)
     unsigned int index = vmsg->payload.state.index;
     unsigned int enable = vmsg->payload.state.num;
 
-    DPRINT("State.index: %d\n", index);
-    DPRINT("State.enable:   %d\n", enable);
+    DPRINT("State.index: %u\n", index);
+    DPRINT("State.enable:   %u\n", enable);
 
     if (index >= dev->max_queues) {
         vu_panic(dev, "Invalid vring_enable index: %u", index);
@@ -1728,7 +1728,7 @@ vu_handle_vring_kick(VuDev *dev, VhostUserMsg *vmsg)
         return false;
     }
 
-    DPRINT("Got kick message: handler:%p idx:%d\n",
+    DPRINT("Got kick message: handler:%p idx:%u\n",
            dev->vq[index].handler, index);
 
     if (!dev->vq[index].started) {
@@ -1772,7 +1772,7 @@ vu_process_message(VuDev *dev, VhostUserMsg *vmsg)
     DPRINT("Request: %s (%d)\n", vu_request_to_string(vmsg->request),
            vmsg->request);
     DPRINT("Flags:   0x%x\n", vmsg->flags);
-    DPRINT("Size:    %d\n", vmsg->size);
+    DPRINT("Size:    %u\n", vmsg->size);
 
     if (vmsg->fd_num) {
         int i;