You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In general I agree. However, in the special case of one selected point, the zoom extent is undefined. I think it is then better to not zoom than to zoom in double. E.g. say you select with expression and zoom to selection many times. If you have a lot of one-point selections, you zoom in more and more. Even if there is the pan to selection tool, if is unconvenient to check the number of selected objects before choosing the map tool.
15e3fc3
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Marco, don't we have separate Pan Map to selection tool for panning without zooming? I believe Zoom should always zoom)
15e3fc3
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In general I agree. However, in the special case of one selected point, the zoom extent is undefined. I think it is then better to not zoom than to zoom in double. E.g. say you select with expression and zoom to selection many times. If you have a lot of one-point selections, you zoom in more and more. Even if there is the pan to selection tool, if is unconvenient to check the number of selected objects before choosing the map tool.