-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
[processing] Add operators for parameter type flags, push warning
to message log for duplicate parameter registration
- Loading branch information
1 parent
74d14ae
commit 227f706
Showing
3 changed files
with
8 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
227f706
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nyalldawson ProcessingQgisAlgorithmsTest is broken, could it be this one?
227f706
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@3nids it's not this - has there been a gdal update on the docker image? I suspect that's what's happened and the new hash needs to be added to the acceptable list.
227f706
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nyalldawson , is there a way to look at the raster story on Travis to make sure it rendered okay prior to adding the hash?
227f706
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nirvn nope - all you get is that hash. You make the call whether it's acceptable! (you CAN visual a raster just from a hash, right?)
227f706
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
BTW, for me on Ubuntu 1.6.04 build failed with