Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

labels consisting of multiple field should be possible #11479

Closed
qgib opened this issue Nov 21, 2008 · 8 comments
Closed

labels consisting of multiple field should be possible #11479

qgib opened this issue Nov 21, 2008 · 8 comments
Labels
Feature Request Vectors Related to general vector layer handling (not specific data formats)
Milestone

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented Nov 21, 2008

Author Name: Gerhard Spieles (Gerhard Spieles)
Original Redmine Issue: 1419

Redmine category:vectors


In practice, often more then one field is necessary to be labeld in multilines
Is it possible to realize this function?

For idea:
In Layer properities, Symbology, [[LegendType]], youu can choose "Uniqe value" an then you can add classes to show different styles depend of the content of fields

The same classification should be good for the labeling.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Nov 19, 2009

Author Name: Jürgen Fischer (@jef-n)


see also #12184

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Nov 19, 2009

Author Name: Jürgen Fischer (@jef-n)


see also #12147

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented May 3, 2011

Author Name: Sandro Santilli (@strk)


Could "multiple labels" as described in ticket #13854 be a solution for this as well ?

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented May 3, 2011

Author Name: Alister Hood (@AlisterH)


No. That is for situations where you want to put different labels in different places. This is for situations where you want to create one label from several fields, e.g. you might want to create a label for a manhole that lists its name, diameter, lid level, and invert level:

MH2
1050Ø
LL 6.8
IL 4.2

You certainly wouldn't want to have these as four different labels around the same point, and you wouldn't want to use four different labels with fixed offsets (especially if some of the information is missing sometimes), and it would be annoying having to set up four sets of labels anyway.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented May 3, 2011

Author Name: Alister Hood (@AlisterH)


That should have looked something like this :)

MH2
1050Ø
LL 6.8
IL 4.2

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented May 4, 2011

Author Name: Sandro Santilli (@strk)


agreed, this one has its own merit (I just had one such use case)

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Jul 14, 2011

Author Name: Borys Jurgiel (@borysiasty)


see also #13548 (and #13901 )


  • assigned_to_id removed nobody

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Aug 28, 2011

Author Name: Aren Cambre (Aren Cambre)


I'm gonna be bold and say that #13548 is an elegant solution to this issue. As #13548 is more specific and has actual progress, it may be best to go with that one.


  • pull_request_patch_supplied was configured as 0
  • status_id was changed from Open to Closed
  • resolution was changed from to duplicate

@qgib qgib added Feature Request Vectors Related to general vector layer handling (not specific data formats) labels May 24, 2019
@qgib qgib added this to the Version 1.7.0 milestone May 24, 2019
@qgib qgib closed this as completed May 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature Request Vectors Related to general vector layer handling (not specific data formats)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant