New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
improvement of spatial selection #13762
Comments
Author Name: Paolo Cavallini (@pcav)
|
Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)
|
Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)
|
Author Name: Pirmin Kalberer (Pirmin Kalberer)
|
Author Name: Pierre-Luc Auclair (Pierre-Luc Auclair) Just a "me too". This would be incredibly useful. I create throwaway buffers so many times every day it's almost ridiculous. |
Author Name: Médéric RIBREUX (Médéric RIBREUX) Hello, bug triage... still no way to make a spatial selection on multiple layers in QGIS 2.13 master. In the ArcGIS implementation, there is a checkable list of all the opened layers on the MXD (project). This list is for target layers (what you want to have selected at the end). So in ArcGIS you can make multiple selection requests (one for each target layer) on the same source layer with only one tool. This is useful because for the moment in QGIS, you have to make each request manually. For buffer selection, I suggest that you use a Processing model with a "Fixed distance buffer" operation on the source layer followed by a "Select by location". When the multiple selection will be implemented (perhaps in Processing tool first), we could close this feature request...
|
Author Name: Médéric RIBREUX (Médéric RIBREUX)
|
Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)
|
Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)
|
Selecting in multiple layers can be done with batch processing mode. Probably this can be closed. |
Author Name: jannekevandijk - (jannekevandijk -)
Original Redmine Issue: 3703
Redmine category:c++_plugins/spatial_query
basically something similar to [[ArcGis]] 'select by location', where you
are able to:
(or should this be two seperate tickets?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: