Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Processing] Union algorithm does not pick attributes from the other layer #25716

Closed
qgib opened this issue Jan 8, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! High Priority Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented Jan 8, 2018

Author Name: Harrissou Santanna (@DelazJ)
Original Redmine Issue: 17820
Affected QGIS version: master
Redmine category:processing/qgis
Assignee: Victor Olaya


From the processing toolbox use the union algorithm on two layers
Check the attributes of the resulting layer: it shows original attributes for features and null in fields coming from the other layer.

osgeo4w aef9df8


Related issue(s): #25030 (duplicates)
Redmine related issue(s): 17131


@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Jan 15, 2018

Author Name: Alexander Bruy (@alexbruy)


Duplicates #25030


  • resolution was changed from to duplicate
  • status_id was changed from Open to Rejected

@qgib qgib closed this as completed Jan 15, 2018
@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Jan 15, 2018

Author Name: Alexander Bruy (@alexbruy)


@qgib qgib added Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! High Priority Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms labels May 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! High Priority Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant